The Mike Leach/Mark
Mangino controversies have been the conversation between my husband and I lately. When has a coach gone to far and when is a coach just motivating and trying to get his players to be a part of team?
On the face it seems that putting an injured player in a confined space for several hours has no value other than to
humiliate and send a message to a player. When I first heard the details Adam James gave to the media about being locked in a dark shed for several hours where he was required to stand, I thought it was outrageous and no coach in their right mind would allow that. Then I starting thinking about other situations in which hazing (which some members of the media have called this) is not only condoned but encouraged.
I thought about my dear husband who used to be an Army guy (or whatever the correct term is). We've often talked late at night about what was
required of him during basic training and some of those things seem just as pointless and humiliating to me. I asked him if he thought those things were humiliating and unnecessary. He said he felt stupid at the time but looking back it built character and a team oriented mindset. I've also watched on the Discovery Channel the training Navy Seals do. They are probably the biggest studs I've ever seen in my life. They can stand in the surf (ocean) for like hours and by hours I mean 8, 9, 10, 14 hours holding HEAVY boats and logs. I thought how humiliating for them to stand there and get yelled at while holding LOGS for hours. However it prepares them for the teamwork it will require to be
successful at the hardest missions given to any military person and allows and individual to see where their limits lie. Now before you start screaming at this post, I'm not comparing college football players to Navy Seals. However, I do think some of the same tactics can apply to both things maybe just to a lesser degree. If Adam James (the Tech Player) wasn't caused any physical damage had it really gone too far?
I'm not sure the even Tech thinks Leach went to far. I think it's a lot more complicated then that. I think that the administrations didn't really like Leach, didn't want to pay him and had a media father very upset. I think this incident made a perfect storm for them to get rid of Leach. I think that after the Mark
Mangino firing at
KU that this will be the new way to get rid of coaches who aren't performing to the standards required. You watch...you'll see much more "player abuse" on teams who are
underperforming.
So what do you think about the Mike Leach firing?